A librarian plays with Google’s autocomplete feature. Hilarity ensues.
(FWIW, if I type “andromeda is”, it autocompletes to “andromeda israel”. If I type “andromeda is “, it has no suggestions at all. Apparently I’m…nothing?)
A librarian plays with Google’s autocomplete feature. Hilarity ensues.
(FWIW, if I type “andromeda is”, it autocompletes to “andromeda israel”. If I type “andromeda is “, it has no suggestions at all. Apparently I’m…nothing?)
On the internet, everyone gets their fifteen seconds of fame.
And this, I guess, is why your circ clerks need to have some discretion about fines.
McSweeney’s list of library science jargon that sounds dirty.
You know….none of it sounded dirty before it was in a list….
Metadata fail at Amazon and the Ass Meat Research Group (surprisingly, safe for work!).
Hilarious slideset on library 2.0 OPAC features with a great subtitle — “Utilising Web 2.0 in the OPAC: lipstick, cowbells and serendipity.”.
Thanks, Onion!
Having dealt with microfilm myself recently (for the first time in, probably, decades), I admit the suspense potential is pretty high. But findability? Not what I’m used to.
This cartoon doesn’t realize that it’s making the same claim as discovery interfaces and other current OPAC design thinking, but it is.
Dudes! Did you see the library they’ve got here?
Thank you, McSweeney’s.